Ohio prototype

Water System Risk & Funding Priority Index

Total records --
High review --
Critical review --
Validation checks passed --
System-sourced service areas --
Modeled service areas --
Approximate locations --
Unmatched geography --
Source protection overlay --

Statewide Screening Map

Zoomable street map with public water system records plotted by best available coordinates.

Risk Tiers

Current filtered record count by review tier.

Top Counties

Counties with the most high-review records.

System Detail

Select a system from the table or map.

Ranked Review List

-- records shown

Page 1 of 1
Rank PWSID System County Score Tier Top driver Spatial

Methodology

The index combines compliance, enforcement, vulnerability, drought, possible funding gap, small-system context, and data quality into a 0-100 review-priority score.

  • Compliance: 30%
  • Enforcement: 15%
  • Vulnerability: 20%
  • Drought: 10%
  • Funding gap: 15%
  • Small-system context: 10%
  • Data quality penalty: -5%

Limitations

Unmatched funding records do not prove that a system received no funding. Low-confidence geography uses county centroid fallback and should be treated as screening context only.